DSIAC was requested to conduct research in support of a decision on whether to use a commercially hosted IR payload (CHIRP) sensor package or attempting to accomplish a similar mission with a UAV network. DSIAC staff conducted research on the two technology packages and then developed a list of pros and cons of each and submitted a response report to the inquirer.
Differences Between CHIRP Satellites and Persistent UAV Networks
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3477/d3477dad60be5ae016cd99924748b12ee9a54b9d" alt="Differences Between CHIRP Satellites and Persistent UAV Networks https://media.defense.gov/2003/Mar/28/2000031150/780/780/0/030328-F-JZ000-034.JPG / (Image Credit: U.S. Air Force)"
https://media.defense.gov/2003/Mar/28/2000031150/780/780/0/030328-F-JZ000-034.JPG / (Image Credit: U.S. Air Force)
Posted on March 30, 2018 | Completed on February 1, 2016 | By: Scott E. Armistead
What are the differences in advantages between commercially hosted infrared payload (CHIRP) satellite and a persistent unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) network?
Want to find out more about this topic?
Request a FREE Technical Inquiry!